Contents

Client Citation Analysis

Effect of organic loading rates on the membrane performance of a thermophilic submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for primary sludge treatment from a pulp and paper mill

This study evaluates how changing organic loading rate (OLR) and hydraulic retention time (HRT) affects membrane performance and mixed-liquor suspended solids (MLSS) properties, including MLSS contact angle measured using a Dropometer.

At-a-Glance Summary

Primary surface measurement reported

The contact angle of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) was measured as part of the study’s MLSS surface-property characterization across operating phases.

Dropometer attribution in the paper

The Methods state that “contact angle of MLSS was measured by using Dropometer M-3 (Droplet Smart Tech Inc. Canada),” using pure water as a probe fluid for the contact angle measurement.

How the surface-tension / contact-angle data were used in the study

Contact angle values are reported by operating phase and discussed in the MLSS “surface properties and dewaterability” results, where the authors interpret changes in contact angle in terms of hydrophobicity trends across different OLR/HRT operating conditions.

Paper Details

Title
Effect of organic loading rates on the membrane performance of a thermophilic submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for primary sludge treatment from a pulp and paper mill
Authors
A. Bokhary; M. Leitch; B.Q. Liao
Journal
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Year
2022
Volume
10
Pages / Article
107523
License
2213-3437/© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Journal context

What it is
Journal-level metrics for the publication venue (not a rating of this specific article).
How to read it
Compare metrics within category; updates are annual and lag current-year publications.

What Was Measured

Primary surface / interfacial measurement

The study reports MLSS contact angle measured using pure water as the probe fluid, with values summarized by operating phase.

Supporting measurements

In the same MLSS “surface properties and dewaterability” dataset, the authors report zeta potential, dewaterability (capillary suction time), soluble microbial products (SMP), and MLSS concentration by phase, alongside discussion of operating-condition effects.

Role of the Dropometer

The paper reports that the contact angle of MLSS was measured using Dropometer M-3 (Droplet Smart Tech Inc. Canada), with pure water used as the probe fluid for the contact angle measurement.

These contact angle values are used to compare MLSS surface-property behavior across the study’s three operating phases (defined by different OLR/HRT conditions) and are interpreted by the authors as hydrophobicity trends.

Method Snapshot

Method Snapshot Table

Operating phase Duration (d) Reactor temperature (°C) HRT (d) OLR (kg‑TSS/m³·d) Dropometer output (MLSS contact angle, °) Probe fluid Instruments Notes
Phase I 1–94 50 ± 1 5 2.2 ± 0.16 64.3 ± 3.2 Pure water Dropometer M-3 (Droplet Smart Tech Inc. Canada) Contact angle reported in Table 2 and discussed in Section 3.5.2.
Phase II 99–206 50 ± 1 3 3.9 ± 0.19 24.6 ± 3.04 Pure water Dropometer M-3 (Droplet Smart Tech Inc. Canada) Contact angle reported in Table 2 and discussed in Section 3.5.2.
Phase III 212–323 50 ± 1 8 1.5 ± 0.10 43.5 ± 5.8 Pure water Dropometer M-3 (Droplet Smart Tech Inc. Canada) Contact angle reported in Table 2 and discussed in Section 3.5.2.

Key Findings

Phase-dependent MLSS contact angle

The reported MLSS contact angle is 64.3 ± 3.2° in Phase I (OLR 2.2 ± 0.16), 24.6 ± 3.04° in Phase II (OLR 3.9 ± 0.19), and 43.5 ± 5.8° in Phase III (OLR 1.5 ± 0.10), as listed in Table 2.

Reported contact angle range and time trend

The authors state that the contact angle of the mixed liquors ranged between 24° and 64° and decreased as operating time increased.

Hydrophobicity interpretation in the discussion

In the MLSS surface-properties discussion, the authors describe a “hydrophobicity” recovery when OLR decreased to 1.5 ± 0.10 kg‑TSS/m³·d, corresponding to the Phase III contact angle value reported in Table 2.

SMP trend discussed alongside contact angle

The authors report that soluble microbial products (SMP) followed the same “hydrophobic trend,” with the highest SMP concentration observed at the lower OLR and vice versa.

Thresholds / Regimes

The study defines three operating phases (I–III) as regimes for comparison, each with specified HRT and OLR conditions; MLSS contact angle is reported for each phase in Table 2.
Regime (phase) HRT (d) OLR (kg‑TSS/m³·d) Phase duration (d) MLSS contact angle
Phase I 5 2.2 ± 0.16 1–94 64.3 ± 3.2
Phase II 3 3.9 ± 0.19 99–206 24.6 ± 3.04
Phase III 8 1.5 ± 0.10 212–323 43.5 ± 5.8

Figures & Visuals

Table 2 — MLSS surface-property dataset including Dropometer contact angle

What it shows

Summarizes zeta potential, dewaterability, contact angle, SMP, and MLSS concentration for Phases I–III.

Table 1 — Operating-condition definition for the phase comparison

What it shows

Lists the digestion conditions used to define Phases I–III (including HRT and OLR) that frame the contact-angle comparison

Figure 2 — Operating time segmentation by phase

What it shows

Shows membrane flux versus operating time with phase labels, providing the operating timeline context for the phase-based MLSS property reporting.

Why It Matters

Within the study’s stated scope, MLSS properties are evaluated alongside membrane performance to understand how operating conditions (OLR/HRT) relate to sludge characteristics under thermophilic submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor operation treating primary sludge from a pulp and paper mill.

The Dropometer-derived MLSS contact angle is one of the reported MLSS “surface properties,” and the authors use the phase-by-phase contact angle results to describe changes in hydrophobicity trends across operating conditions, discussing these trends in parallel with SMP behavior.

Practical Takeaways

Dropometer method as described

For MLSS wettability characterization in this study, contact angle is measured using Dropometer M-3 (Droplet Smart Tech Inc. Canada) with pure water as the probe fluid.

Phase-based contact angle reporting

MLSS contact angle is presented by operating phase in Table 2, enabling direct comparison across the study’s three OLR/HRT conditions.

Reported magnitude of change across operating conditions

Across Phases I–III, the reported MLSS contact angle values shift from 64.3 ± 3.2° to 24.6 ± 3.04° to 43.5 ± 5.8°.

Interpreted as hydrophobicity trend

The authors discuss the contact-angle changes in terms of a hydrophobicity trend across operating phases and relate SMP behavior to the same trend.

Download Experiment