Primary surface measurement reported
Water contact angle of fabricated and surface-coated LIG electrodes, used to characterize wettability during comparison of four DADMAC/GO-PDDA functionalization methods.
Client Citation Analysis
A dip-and-read capacitive electrochemical sensor for orthophosphate monitoring
This study develops a reagent-free GO-PDDA/laser-induced graphene orthophosphate sensor, and uses Dropometer-measured water contact angle to compare how different LIG surface-functionalization routes change electrode wettability.
At-a-Glance Summary
Dropometer attribution in the paper
The authors report that all goniometry experiments used a “Droplet lab DROPOMETER-M (Markham, ON, Canada),” with contact angle calculated by the non-axisymmetric (polynomial) method.
How the surface-tension / contact-angle data were used in the study
The contact-angle data were part of the comparative functionalization study, alongside electrochemical and microscopy data, and showed that GO-PDDA-modified LIG had contact angles above 120°, while DADMAC-coated LIG was below 45°. This wettability split helped distinguish the coating chemistries before the authors advanced GO-PDDA-coated electrodes into sensor-performance testing.
Replication / reliability statement
Goniometry experiments were repeated in triplicate.
Paper Details
Title
A dip-and-read capacitive electrochemical sensor for orthophosphate monitoring
Authors
Geisianny Moreira, Alex B Shaw, Nafisa Amin, Wei Gao, Debabrata Sahoo, Eric S McLamore
Journal
Sustainability Science and Technology
Year
2026
Volume
3
Pages / Article
014004
License
CC BY 4.0
Journal context
What it is
Journal-level metrics for the publication venue (not a rating of this specific article).
How to read it
Compare metrics within category; updates are annual and lag current-year publications.
Scopus metrics (Elsevier / Scopus rating 2024)
CiteScore 2024
3
What Was Measured
Primary surface / interfacial measurement
The paper reports water contact angle measurements on LIG electrodes after fabrication and after surface coating, using those data to characterize wettability across the compared functionalization routes. In the comparative study, GO-PDDA-modified LIG showed contact angles above 120°, while DADMAC-coated LIG showed contact angles below 45°.
Supporting measurements
Supporting measurements included zeta potential of GO-PDDA suspensions, cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, open-circuit-potential water-layer tests, SEM, EDS, pH measurement, and EPA 365.3 colorimetric comparison in creek-water samples.
Role of the Dropometer
The Dropometer was used in Section 2.5 to measure water contact angle on LIG sensor chips after fabrication and after surface coating. The chips were positioned in sample mounts, a 2 µl aliquot was dispensed with the microneedle system, and contact angle was calculated using the non-axisymmetric (polynomial) method.
In the paper’s workflow, the wettability data served as a fast surface-state comparison across the four LIG functionalization routes and helped separate GO-PDDA-coated surfaces from DADMAC-coated surfaces within the broader optimization study.
Key Findings
Clear wettability split by coating chemistry
Contact-angle measurements separated the two coating families cleanly: GO-PDDA-modified LIG showed contact angles above 120°, while DADMAC-coated LIG showed contact angles below 45°. In the paper, this wettability readout sat alongside SEM, EDS, and electrochemical data in the four-method comparison.
GO-PDDA coatings delivered the strongest electrochemical surface response
GO-PDDA functionalization increased electroactive surface area relative to bare and DADMAC-coated electrodes, and the highest reported specific capacitance was for grafted GO-PDDA at 3463 ± 230 F g⁻¹. This is the surface family the authors advanced into the dip-and-read orthophosphate workflow.
Grafted GO-PDDA gave the strongest calibration performance
Using net capacitance at 10 mHz, grafted GO-PDDA sensors showed linearity from 10 ppb to 200 ppb and extended to 2 ppm, with sensitivity of 138 ± 15 mF ppm⁻¹ and LOD of 20 ± 4 ppb. These values exceeded the drop-cast GO-PDDA configuration.
Selectivity improved in the mildly alkaline regime
The grafted GO-PDDA sensors were at least 93% selective over chloride and nitrate and more than 97% selective over bicarbonate, Tris, and potassium hydrogen phthalate, while sulfate gave the largest interference. The authors also report higher sensitivity at pH 8–9 than at pH 7.
Field-facing validation supported reuse and creek-water testing
Creek-water measurements were highly correlated with EPA method 365.3, and regenerated sensors retained at least 90% of analytical sensitivity through four uses. This positions the final grafted GO-PDDA/LIG design as the paper’s preferred reagent-free dip-and-read format.
Figures & Visuals
Scheme 1 — Functionalization matrix behind the wettability study
What it shows
The scheme lays out the four LIG coating routes that were later compared by contact angle, electrochemistry, and microscopy.
Figure 2 — Electrochemical comparison interpreted alongside wettability
What it shows
Figure 2 shows how the coating comparison translated into electroactive surface area and specific capacitance, which the authors discuss together with the wettability results from the comparative study.
Why It Matters
In this paper, the Dropometer’s role is tightly defined and practical: it gives a surface-wettability readout for the same LIG coatings that are later judged by electrochemical performance. That makes contact angle part of the authors’ surface-selection logic, rather than a standalone characterization add-on.
For a prospective Droplet Lab audience, the key point is that the Dropometer was used in a real sensor-development workflow to help distinguish which electrode coatings created markedly different wetting states before the authors committed to full calibration, selectivity, regeneration, and creek-water validation of the final sensor architecture.
Practical Takeaways
Wettability quickly separated coating families.
In this study, Dropometer measurements immediately distinguished GO-PDDA-modified LIG (>120°) from DADMAC-coated LIG (<45°), giving a rapid screen for surface-state differences during electrode optimization.
Contact angle was used as part of a multi-metric surface screen.
The authors interpreted wettability together with SEM, EDS, CV, and EIS rather than in isolation, which made the Dropometer output directly useful inside the coating-comparison workflow.
Grafted GO-PDDA was the winning surface architecture.
That configuration carried forward into the main sensor study and delivered the paper’s strongest range, sensitivity, and LOD.
The final sensing workflow favored mildly alkaline samples.
Higher sensitivity at pH 8–9 shaped the preferred operating regime reported by the authors for orthophosphate detection.
Regeneration supported repeated use.
A 5 min regeneration step in pH 5 buffer preserved at least 90% analytical sensitivity through four uses in the reported workflow.