“
On a real surface, the receding angle from a sessile drop and from a tilted plate can disagree wildly: one method is not a substitute for the other. The application decides.
AATCC TM22 gives a spray rating: a visual score of how much a fabric wets under a standard water spray. The Dropometer does not measure that rating, so it complements the TM22 workflow. With the fabric holder option it measures water contact angle and sliding angle on the fabric. Those numbers rank finishes and track wash durability before you confirm with the spray test.
What brings you here?
R&D
You need to rank many finish recipes and cure settings without a spray test for each one. Contact and sliding angle give a number per spot from a small fabric piece.
Quality manager
You report spray ratings to customers. An angle screen tells you which lots and wash stages to send to the spray tester first, once you have set limits from your own fabrics.
Lab manager
Keep your spray tester for reported AATCC TM22 ratings. The Dropometer adds a measured angle that shows why a fabric drops from one rating step to the next.
Free one page checklist for screening DWR fabric with contact and sliding angle before the AATCC TM22 spray test: what to prepare, the settings to lock and what to record.
Talk to an expert
Tell us your fabric, finish and the spray ratings you need. We will measure contact and sliding angle live and tell you plainly where the Dropometer fits next to your spray tester and where it does not.
AATCC TM22-2024, Test Method for Water Repellency: Spray Test, from AATCC, the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. Older specifications may still cite earlier editions such as TM22-2014. It applies to any textile fabric, finished or not, and rates the wetted pattern left by a standard spray against a photographic scale. ISO 4920:2012 describes a spray test for resistance to surface wetting.
Complements workflow. The Dropometer does not measure a spray rating, the quantity TM22 reports. It measures water contact angle and sliding angle on the fabric, which explain why a fabric rates well or badly and let you screen finishes before the spray test.
Contact angle range 10° to 175°, accuracy ±0.35°, display resolution 0.01°. Sliding angle on a tilt stage from 0 to 60°, manual, with an automatic sliding stage add-on. Fabric holder option. All from the Dropometer product specification.
The drop shape method is validated against a KRUSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers. See our validation publications.
A federal research team in Canada used the Dropometer on water repellent coatings applied to white polyester fabric. Read the case study. University researchers also used a Droplet Lab goniometer to measure water contact angles of 130.1° to 143.2° on electrospun polystyrene fibre mats (Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2024). Read our analysis of the paper.
Neither the spray rating nor drop angles measure water passing through the fabric. ISO states its spray test is not meant to predict rain penetration (source: ISO 4920:2012 abstract). Use a penetration test for that.
What this standard measures, who uses it and how the Dropometer fits
AATCC TM22 rates the water repellency of a fabric by spraying water onto a taut specimen and comparing the wetted pattern with a photographic chart, on a scale from 0 to 100. The spray test apparatus pours a set volume of distilled water through a funnel and spray nozzle onto the specimen, held taut in a hoop at an angle. Textile mills, makers of durable water repellents (DWR) and outdoor apparel brands use the spray rating in specifications and incoming checks. The Dropometer does not measure a spray rating, so it complements the TM22 workflow and does not replace it. With the fabric holder option it measures the water contact angle and sliding angle of single drops on the fabric, which shows how well the finish repels water as made and after washing.
Why that helps: a high contact angle and a low sliding angle mean drops bead up and roll off, the behaviour a good spray rating rewards. The angles give a number for every spot, so you can rank finishes and follow wash durability between spray tests. Well finished, textured fabric can show the lotus effect, where drops rest on fibre tips and trapped air. The spray rating stays the result you report. Build the link between angles and ratings from your own fabrics.
The Dropometer contact angle and sliding angle kit reads contact angle with ±0.35° accuracy (Dropometer datasheet) and tilts samples from 0 to 60°. For the full screening workflow, see textile DWR water repellency testing. A federal research team in Canada used the Dropometer on water repellent coatings applied to white polyester fabric. Researchers also used it to measure the water contact angle of electrospun polystyrene fibre mats. For background, read the fabrics guide and the contact angle measurement guide.
Further reading: reproducible contact angle measurement, choosing a contact angle goniometer for industrial QA and the production line, why you need dynamic surface tension, a classroom experiment that makes superhydrophobic glass with a flame and our open reference measurement dataset.
A contact and sliding angle screen on fabric, run before the AATCC TM22 spray test
These steps describe a Dropometer screen that sits before and after the spray test. They are not the AATCC TM22 procedure and do not replace it. Buy the current edition and run it on a spray tester for any spray rating you report.
From the Dropometer product specification. Display resolution is 0.01°.
Manual tilt as standard, automatic sliding stage as an add-on. Fabric holder option keeps the fabric flat.
Base plate, phone holder, LED and syringe. No PC needed.
Cut pieces from the same lot you will spray test, and mark the face side and the warp direction. Handle them by the edges. Condition them in the same textile atmosphere you use for the spray test.
Clamp the piece flat and taut in the fabric holder, face side up. Loose or puckered fabric tilts the baseline and changes the angle. Level the base plate, mount the phone and LED, and fill the syringe with deionised water.
Place a drop of fixed volume gently on the fabric and capture it at a fixed time after placement. Automatic edge and baseline detection reads the left and right angles, so two operators get the same reading from the same image. On textured fabric this is an apparent angle; see the lotus effect.
Tilt the stage slowly until the drop rolls off, and record that angle. Use the same drop volume every time, because larger drops slide sooner. A drop that has not moved by 60°, the end of the tilt stage, is recorded as 60° or more.
Read several spots in warp and weft directions, as made and after each laundering or abrasion step your customer specifies. Rinse well after washing, because detergent left in the fabric lowers both angles.
Send the shortlisted fabrics to the AATCC TM22 spray tester and record the rating next to the angles. Over time these pairs become your own correlation, which sets the screen limits. See textile DWR water repellency testing.
This video shows a complete Dropometer contact angle measurement, from setup to result. It covers the steps above in one run.
Independent benchmarking and publication-based validation references.
Peer reviewed method
The Dropometer drop shape method is validated against a KRUSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers, one in Review of Scientific Instruments and one in Colloids and Surfaces A. Contact angle accuracy is ±0.35° (Dropometer product specification).
Customer evidence
A federal research team in Canada used the Dropometer on water repellent coatings applied to white polyester fabric. We have no published client study that pairs Dropometer angles with AATCC TM22 spray ratings.
AATCC TM22 · spray rating · DWR fabric screening
AATCC TM22 rates the wetted pattern against a photographic scale (source: AATCC, The Art of Testing: Water Repellency). In summary: 100 is no sticking or wetting of the upper surface, 90 is slight random sticking or wetting, 80 is wetting at the spray points, 70 is partial wetting of the whole upper surface, 50 is complete wetting of the upper surface and 0 is complete wetting of both surfaces (source: rating descriptions quoted in US patent 8329255).
No published table converts a contact angle or sliding angle into a spray rating. So set your screen limits from your own correlation study. Run the spray test and the Dropometer on the same fabrics, as made and after washing, then pick the angles that separate the ratings your customers accept from the ones they reject.
Repeat the study when you change fibre, weave, finish chemistry or curing. Follow reproducible contact angle measurement practice so the angles are comparable between shifts and sites.
Example data for illustration only. These are not measured results. Your own fabric, finish and wash routine decide the numbers.
| Fabric and wash state | Contact angle, mean of 5 (°) | Sliding angle, mean of 5 (°) | Spray rating, TM22 (example lab result) | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finish A, as made | 148.5 | 12 | 100 | Beads and rolls off: send to spray test |
| Finish A, after 10 washes | 141.2 | 24 | 90 | Still repellent, drops roll later |
| Finish A, after 20 washes | 132.8 | 48 | 80 | Finish wearing: check cure and wash routine |
| Finish B, after 20 washes | 121.4 | 60 or more (no slide) | 70 | Drops pin: below example screen limit |
Each angle is the mean of five drops in the fabric holder. Sliding angle is read on the tilt stage; a drop that has not moved by 60° is recorded as 60° or more. The spray rating column is an example lab result from a separate AATCC TM22 spray tester, not a Dropometer reading.
The same example data as the table: contact angle falls and sliding angle rises as the finish wears, in step with the example spray ratings.
Example data, not measured results.
What changes when an angle screen sits before the spray tester
| Metric | Before Dropometer | With Dropometer | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result format | A rating in steps from 0 to 100, read by eye against a chart | A contact angle per drop with ±0.35° accuracy, plus a sliding angle | AATCC TM22 listing; Dropometer product specification |
| Small changes in the finish | Can stay inside one rating step | Show as a trend in angle across wash cycles | No published benchmark |
| Material per check | A full specimen on the spray hoop | A small piece in the fabric holder, several spots | No published benchmark |
| Reported TM22 result | Spray tester | Still the spray tester | AATCC TM22 scope |
Bring a fabric that rates well and one that does not, as made or after washing. We will measure both live.
Enter your own numbers. The defaults are examples, not Droplet Lab results.
Quality cost snapshot
Result
Annual exposure combines audit/CAPA cost, customer rejections, and recall probability; avoided exposure applies the risk reduction percentage.
Lock these before you compare angles between finishes, wash cycles or sites
| Parameter | Recommended Setting | Technical Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Test liquid | Deionised water | Close to the distilled water the spray test uses. Oils and water alcohol mixtures belong to other repellency tests. |
| Mounting | Fabric holder, flat and taut, face side up | Loose fabric tilts the baseline and changes both angles. |
| Drop volume | Fixed for every drop and recorded | Sliding angle depends strongly on drop size, and contact angle less so. |
| Reading time | Fixed time after placement, the same for every drop | Drops can sink into a worn finish. The 10 frames per second camera suits readings from about 0.1 s. |
| Fit model | Young-Laplace or polynomial, the same for every run | Both models are in the Dropometer software. Do not mix them within one study. |
| Sliding angle | Tilt stage 0 to 60°; no slide recorded as 60° or more | 60° is the end of the tilt stage (Dropometer datasheet). |
| Spots and direction | Several spots, warp and weft | Weave and yarn texture change the apparent angle. |
| Wash state | As made and after each wash or abrasion step | Durability, not the fresh finish, is usually what the customer buys. |
| Environment | Condition as for the spray test; record room temperature and humidity | The Dropometer has no temperature or humidity control and runs at 10 to 45 °C. |
Pick the method by the question you need answered
Start: What do you need to know about the fabric's water repellency?
Your specification, label or customer asks for an AATCC TM22 spray rating.
Run AATCC TM22 on a spray tester. The Dropometer does not give a spray rating; it complements the test.
You want a number per spot to compare recipes, cure settings or wash cycles before spray testing.
Measure water contact angle and sliding angle on the Dropometer with the fabric holder, then confirm the shortlist with TM22. See textile DWR water repellency testing.
You need a grade for resistance to oily or alcohol based liquids.
Use AATCC TM118 or AATCC TM193. Contact angle with the same liquids can add a measured value.
You need to know if rain or pressure pushes water through, not just whether the surface wets.
Use a penetration test such as the AATCC TM42 impact penetration test, a hydrostatic pressure test or a rain test. ISO states its spray test does not predict rain penetration.
Start from the question you need answered. Blue boxes are measurements the Dropometer runs.
Is AATCC TM22 the right test?
What contact and sliding angle tell you about a spray rating, and what they do not
Honest limits of the method and of the Dropometer
It measures how well a fabric resists surface wetting by water. Water is sprayed onto a taut specimen held at an angle, and the wetted pattern is compared with a photographic chart. The result is a spray rating from 0 to 100. The test method is applicable to any textile fabric, with or without a water repellent finish.
100 means no sticking or wetting of the upper surface. 90 is slight random wetting, 80 is wetting at the spray points and 70 is partial wetting of the whole upper surface. 50 is complete wetting of the upper surface and 0 means both surfaces are wet. Your customer sets the pass rating, often before and after washing.
No. AATCC TM22 reports a visual spray rating from a spray tester, and the Dropometer does not measure that rating. It complements the workflow: with the fabric holder option it measures water contact angle and sliding angle, which show why a fabric beads or wets. Use it to screen finishes and wash cycles, then confirm with the spray test. See textile DWR water repellency testing.
Only through your own data. No published table converts an angle into a spray rating, and spray drops land with force that a placed drop does not have. Measure the same fabrics both ways, as made and after washing, and set screen limits from those pairs.
A high contact angle shows drops bead up. A low sliding angle shows they also roll off, which is what keeps the surface dry under spray. As a finish wears, drops often start to pin before the contact angle falls far, so sliding angle can show wear earlier.
They are close relatives: both spray water onto a taut fabric and rate surface wetting by eye. They come from different bodies and report on their own scales. Check which designation your customer names and quote that one. ISO notes that its spray test does not predict rain penetration (source: ISO 4920:2012).
Yes, with care. The Dropometer software calculates surface free energy with the Equation of State, Fowkes and van Oss Chaudhury Good models. OWRK (Owens Wendt Rabel Kaelble) and Wu are not built in: measure the angles with the Dropometer and run OWRK in the free Contact Angle to Surface Energy Calculator. Measure on a smooth film of the finish, because fabric texture distorts the angles these models need.
Yes. AATCC TM22 rates surface wetting whatever the chemistry, so it applies to fluorinated and non fluorinated DWRs alike. With the ongoing move towards non fluorinated chemistries, away from long chain perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances such as PFOA and PFOS, labs compare alternative chemistries on spray rating, durability of the repellent after home laundering, and water contact and sliding angle. Water repellency often holds up better than oil repellency after the switch, so check both if your product needs it.
This page summarises AATCC TM22 in our own words and does not reproduce the standard. Buy the current edition from AATCC before you write a procedure. The Dropometer complements the workflow: it measures contact angle and sliding angle on fabric, not the spray rating the standard specifies. Droplet Lab does not certify compliance. Your own method validation does.
Sources, review and tools
AATCC TM22-2024 listing (AATCC store); AATCC TM22 listing and apparatus (AATCC store); AATCC: The Art of Testing, Water Repellency; ISO 4920:2012 listing, Textile fabrics: resistance to surface wetting (spray test), the Dropometer product specification and Droplet Lab validation papers.
Drafted with Claude (Anthropic) from the sources listed, then reviewed by Droplet Lab.
We did not copy text from the standard. Buy the current edition for the full procedure.
October 2026
Spotted an issue in this summary? Send a correction request and our team will review it.
Correction Request
We work hard to keep this page accurate and up to date. If you spot an error (wrong revision/year, missing requirement, incorrect interpretation, or broken link), tell us and we'll review it.
Contact us to report a correction