Contents

Client Citation Analysis

Fully Inkjet-Printed Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/Graphene Electrodes for Electroanalytical Sensing with pH Switchable Selectivity

A University of Bologna team set out to inkjet print a crosslinked PNIPAAm hydrogel coating onto printed graphene electrodes and test it for electroanalysis. The coated electrodes blocked negatively charged redox species near neutral pH and switched selectivity at pH 2. The Dropometer measured the hydrogel ink's surface tension by pendant drop, showing a small Triton X-100 addition lowered it from 70 to about 30 mN/m.

At-a-Glance Summary

Primary surface measurement reported

Surface tension of the prepolymerized PNIPAAm hydrogel ink, before and after adding 2.4 µL of Triton X-100. The paper reports 70 mN/m before and about 30 mN/m after.

Research question

Can a temperature responsive PNIPAAm hydrogel be inkjet printed and photopolymerized on printed graphene electrodes, and how does the coating change electrochemical selectivity?

Headline finding

The printed coating blocked negatively charged redox species near neutral pH and let positive ones through. At pH 2 this selectivity reversed, while temperature had no relevant effect.

Paper Details

Authors
Samuele Scotti, Andreas Lesch
Affiliation
Department of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Journal
Electrochimica Acta
Year
2026
Volume
576
Issue / Article
Article 149649 (no issue number stated)
Licence
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (open access, as stated in the paper)
Pendant drop surface tension of one inkjet ink formulation
Measurement scope
Dropometer measurement
  • Liquid: prepolymerized aqueous PNIPAAm hydrogel precursor ink
  • Two states reported: before and after adding 2.4 µL Triton X-100
  • Values reported in the text only, not in a figure or table
Water based monomer, crosslinker, catalyst and photoinitiator ink
Ink formulation
Ink components
  • 12% (w/v) NIPAAm with N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide stock solution
  • TEMED as catalyst and riboflavin as photoinitiator
  • Triton X-100 as surfactant to lower surface tension
Viscometry, inkjet printing with UV curing, microscopy and cyclic voltammetry
Other techniques in the study
Non Droplet Lab methods
  • Viscosity: A&D SV-1A viscometer
  • Printing: Fujifilm Dimatix DMP-2831 with an OmniCure S2000 UV lamp
  • Electrochemistry: VersaSTAT 3F and CHI-900 potentiostats

Classification

This paper uses pendant drop surface tension to qualify an inkjet ink for printed electrochemical sensors.

What Was Measured

Primary surface / interfacial measurement

Surface tension of the prepolymerized PNIPAAm ink, measured by pendant drop on the Dropometer. The authors report 70 mN/m before surfactant and about 30 mN/m after adding 2.4 µL Triton X-100.

Supporting measurements

Ink viscosity came from an A&D SV-1A viscometer. Electrode coverage was checked by optical and digital microscopy. Sensor behaviour came from cyclic voltammetry on two potentiostats.

Instruments Mentioned

Dropometer pendant drop analyzer (Droplet Lab, Canada)

Surface tension of the hydrogel inkjet ink before and after surfactant addition.

Viscometer SV-1A (A&D Weighing, Japan)

Ink viscosity, raised from 0.9 to about 1.8 mPa s by controlled prepolymerization.

Dimatix Materials Printer DMP-2831 (Fujifilm)

Drop on demand printing of graphene, insulator and hydrogel layers with DMC-11610 cartridges.

OmniCure S2000 Spot UV Curing System (Excelitas)

UV light for ink prepolymerization and for curing during printing.

VersaSTAT 3F (Ametek) and CHI-900 (CH Instruments) potentiostats

Cyclic voltammetry of bare and coated graphene electrodes.

Leitz Laborlux D microscope and Dino-Lite AM4133T digital microscope

Visual inspection of electrodes and hydrogel coverage.

AMEL Instrument 338 pH meter

pH of electrolyte solutions.

Role of the Droplet Lab instrument

The Dropometer measured the surface tension of the hydrogel inkjet ink by pendant drop. The paper names it as the Dropometer pendant droplet analyzer from Droplet Lab, Canada.

Before surfactant, the prepolymerized ink measured 70 mN/m, which the authors judged not printable. After adding 2.4 µL of Triton X-100, it measured about 30 mN/m, which they judged printable.

The Dropometer did not measure viscosity; a separate A&D viscometer did. It also measured no contact angles, layer thickness or electrochemical response, which drive the paper's main conclusions.

The paper does not report drop volume, needle size, temperature, replicates, drop age or fitting model for the surface tension readings.

The surface tension reading confirmed when the ink reached a printable range, one of two rheology checks before printing. It supports ink formulation, not the pH switchable sensing result.

Bring This Measurement Into Your Lab

Need to confirm a new ink or coating liquid is in its printable surface tension range before it reaches the printhead? See how the Dropometer handles this measurement.

Method Snapshot

Droplet Lab measurement protocol

Parameter Value as reported
Instrument Dropometer pendant droplet analyzer (Droplet Lab, Canada)
Property measured Ink surface tension
Liquid Prepolymerized PNIPAAm hydrogel precursor ink in water
Ink base 4 mL of 12% (w/v) NIPAAm with crosslinker stock, plus 90 µL riboflavin stock and 7.5 µL TEMED
Surfactant added 2.4 µL Triton X-100
Drop volume Not stated in the paper
Needle Not stated in the paper
Fit / model Not stated in the paper
Temperature Not stated in the paper
Replicates Not stated in the paper
Timing / drop age Not stated in the paper
Software Not stated in the paper

Ink preparation context (other instruments)

Step Value as reported
Prepolymerization light source OmniCure S2000, iris 1% to 3%, stirred at 600 to 1500 rpm
Viscosity instrument A&D SV-1A viscometer
Viscosity before and after prepolymerization 0.9 mPa s to about 1.8 mPa s
Additions after surfactant 20 µL TEMED and 600 µL riboflavin stock for final curing
Printer Fujifilm Dimatix DMP-2831, DMC-11610 cartridges, 10 pL nominal drops

Key Findings

Surfactant brought the ink into range

Adding 2.4 µL Triton X-100 lowered ink surface tension from 70 to about 30 mN/m, measured on the Dropometer.

Prepolymerization raised viscosity

A controlled UV prepolymerization raised viscosity from 0.9 to about 1.8 mPa s, measured on an A&D viscometer.

An insulator grid evened out the coating

Printing the hydrogel into grid cavities gave far more even coverage. On one electrode with six printed layers, thickness ranged from about 1 to 14 µm.

Selectivity switched with pH

Near neutral pH, the coating blocked ferricyanide but passed ruthenium hexaammine. At pH 2, the pattern reversed, while 4 °C to 80 °C changed little.

Ascorbate was filtered at pH 7.4

With the coating, 5 mM ascorbate was hardly detected at pH 7.4, while 1 mM dopamine gave a clear oxidation signal.

Measured Values by Sample

Surface tension values measured on the Dropometer, as reported in the text of Section 3.1.

Ink surface tension by pendant drop

Sample Value
Prepolymerized PNIPAAm ink, no surfactant (reported as not printable) 70 mN/m
Same ink after 2.4 µL Triton X-100 (reported as printable) about 30 mN/m

Figures & Visuals

No figure in this paper contains Dropometer data; the surface tension values appear only in the text of Section 3.1. The paper is published under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, so we link to figures rather than reproduce or adapt them.

Figure 1: Printed electrodes and hydrogel coverage

Shows the printed graphene electrodes and how the grid improved hydrogel coverage. It contains no Dropometer data. Source: Scotti and Lesch, Electrochimica Acta 2026, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Why It Matters

Inkjet printheads only jet inks within a set surface tension and viscosity window. Measuring both lets a lab confirm a new functional ink is printable before loading a cartridge.

Surface tension is a gate for printing

The authors treated 70 mN/m as not printable and about 30 mN/m as printable for their setup.

Small surfactant doses move the number

Just 2.4 µL of Triton X-100, added to an example batch built on 4 mL of stock solution, produced the reported drop in surface tension.

Two properties, two instruments

Surface tension and viscosity were measured on separate instruments and adjusted by separate steps.

This water based ink started at 70 mN/m before surfactant

Surfactant lowers tension; prepolymerization raises viscosity

Check both before printing a reactive ink

Expert Perspective

Expert Perspective

Surface tension versus concentration is one of the few measurements that lets you watch a surfactant reorganise an interface in real time — read the curve, not just the endpoint.

Dr Alidad Amirfazli

Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, York University, Co-founder and Scientific Advisor, Droplet Lab

Practical Takeaways

Measure the ink you will actually print

Extra catalyst and photoinitiator were added after the surfactant. Measure the final ink, not only an intermediate.

Record the conditions

Drop volume, temperature, drop age and replicates were not reported. Logging them makes your values comparable across batches.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Dropometer measure in this study?

It measured the surface tension of the hydrogel inkjet ink by pendant drop. The ink measured 70 mN/m before surfactant and about 30 mN/m after adding 2.4 µL Triton X-100.

Did the Dropometer measure viscosity or contact angle here?

No. Viscosity was measured on an A&D SV-1A viscometer. The paper reports no contact angle measurements, and its wetting comments draw on earlier work and microscopy.

Why did the ink need a lower surface tension?

The authors found the ink at 70 mN/m was not printable on their inkjet setup. A small surfactant addition brought it to about 30 mN/m, which they judged printable.

Does the surface tension result explain the pH switchable selectivity?

No. The surface tension measurement supported ink formulation only. The selectivity came from cyclic voltammetry, and the authors say its origin remains unclear.

Citation

Use the formal reference below when citing the original paper.

Formal Reference

Scotti, S., & Lesch, A. (2026). Fully inkjet-printed poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/graphene electrodes for electroanalytical sensing with pH switchable selectivity. Electrochimica Acta, 576, 149649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2026.149649

Short Cite + DOI

Scotti and Lesch, Electrochimica Acta 2026, 576, 149649. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2026.149649