Contents

Construction Industry
The Practical Guide to Surface Science (2026)

?s=100&d=m
Written by
No biography added yet.
Read More
?s=100&d=m
Reviewed by
N/A
No biography added yet.
Read More
?s=100&d=m
Written By

No biography added yet.

?s=100&d=m
Reviewed By

N/A N/A

No biography added yet.

This is a practical guide to Surface Science for researchers working in the Construction Industry.

In this all-new guide you’ll learn all about:

  • Crucial surface science principles
  • The significance of surface science measurements for the Construction industry
  • Applicable ASTM Standards & Guidelines

Let’s dive right in.

construction

Executive Summary

What it covers: A practical surface-science playbook for construction researchers, explaining why surface properties matter for concrete and how to measure contact angle, surface tension (including dynamic), surface energy, and sliding angle to improve materials and coatings. It connects these measurements to real construction problems like corrosion risk, waterproofing, adhesion, and slip safety.
Key insights: Real construction surfaces rarely have a single “true” contact angle, so advancing/receding angles (hysteresis) provide a more complete picture of spreading, removability, cleanliness, roughness, and homogeneity than a single static value. Young–Laplace fitting is typically more consistent but prefers axisymmetric drops, while polynomial fits tolerate non-axisymmetry yet can be more sensitive to local imperfections; dynamic surface tension is critical when interfaces change fast (droplets/bubbles, foams, drying paints).
Business value: These measurements help engineers design lower-maintenance, higher-performance surfaces—e.g., self-cleaning solar panels via higher contact angle, better waterproofing via low-surface-tension membranes, and safer walkways via superhydrophobic/low-sliding-angle surfaces. They also reduce coating and bonding failures (steel–concrete composites, paint/pretreatments) by detecting incompatibility, contamination, and process drift before costly rework.
Standards to follow: EN 828:2013 outlines a repeatable method for assessing wettability and estimating surface free energy from static contact angles using one or more probe liquids to support bonding/coating readiness decisions. Follow its reporting discipline (substrate condition and time history, probe liquids/properties, droplet method/timepoint, replication and exclusions, and the SFE model/software used) and set acceptance thresholds only after correlating to your own bond-strength tests.
Bottom line: Surface science turns wetting, adhesion, waterproofing, and slip resistance from trial-and-error into measurable, controllable design inputs for modern construction materials. Use dynamic metrics when real surfaces and fast-changing interfaces demand them, and anchor QC decisions to EN 828-style documentation for reproducible, defensible results.

Chapter 1: Introduction

Concrete is the most widely used material in the global construction industry. It is cost-effective, offers high compressive strength, is durable, has a relatively simple production process, and requires minimal maintenance. Despite these advantages, concrete has a hydrophilic, porous structure that can pose challenges during construction. One major issue is the corrosion of steel reinforcement due to concrete’s water absorption, which reduces the lifespan of concrete structures. Additionally, there is a growing demand for intelligent, resilient, and sustainable buildings and infrastructures that focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. To meet these demands, new concrete materials such as low carbon footprint cement, self-compacting concrete, self-healing and self-sensing concrete, and superhydrophobic cementitious materials with self-cleaning capabilities have been developed. Modifying surface properties plays a crucial role in addressing the challenges of traditional concrete and in creating this new class of advanced materials.

We use the following surface properties to understand the behavior of Construction products and improve their quality.

Chapter 2: Contact Angle Measurement

The contact angle quantifies the wettability of a surface by representing the angle between a liquid’s surface and a solid surface.
Dropletlab Research

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer.

Young – Laplace Method

Polynomial Method

Dynamic Contact Angle

Ideally, when we place a drop on a solid surface, a unique angle exists between the liquid and the solid surface. We can calculate the value of this ideal contact angle (the so-called Young’s contact angle) using Young’s equation. In practice, due to surface geometry, roughness, heterogeneity, contamination, and deformation, the contact angle value on a surface is not necessarily a single consistent value but rather falls within a range. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as the advancing and receding contact angles, respectively. The values of advancing and receding contact angles for a solid surface are highly sensitive to many parameters, such as temperature, humidity, homogeneity, and minor contamination of the surface and liquid. For example, the advancing and receding contact angles of a surface can differ at different locations.

Dynamic Contact Angle versus Static Contact Angle

Practical surfaces and coatings naturally show contact angle hysteresis, indicating a range of equilibrium values. When we measure static contact angles, we get a single value within this range. Solely relying on static measurements poses problems, like poor repeatability and incomplete surface assessment regarding adhesion, cleanliness, roughness, and homogeneity.

In practical applications, we need to understand how easily a liquid spreads (advancing angle) and how easily it is removed (receding angle), such as in painting and cleaning. Measuring advancing and receding angles offers a holistic view of liquid-solid interaction, unlike static measurements, which yield an arbitrary value within the range.

This insight is crucial for real-world surfaces with variations, roughness, and dynamics, aiding industries like cosmetics, materials science, and biotechnology in designing effective surfaces and optimizing processes.

Learn how Contact Angle measurement is done on our Tensiometer

For a more complete understanding of Contact Angle measurement, read our Contact Angle measurement: The Definitive Guide

Open Benchmark Data: Contact Angle & Surface Energy

These reference measurements show how deionized water wets four standard substrates measured with the Droplet Lab Dropometer. Use them as visual and numerical benchmarks when you're checking your own sample preparation, treatments, and chemistry.

Full contact angle and surface energy datasets (including additional liquids and statistics) are available on our dataset hub.

Glass - DI Water
Glass - DI Water
Nylon - DI Water
Nylon - DI Water
PMMA - DI Water
PMMA - DI Water
Teflon - DI Water
Teflon - DI Water

The droplet images above are taken from the same benchmark series as our open dataset. For each substrate and probe liquid we report:

● Advancing and receding contact angles (and hysteresis)
● Derived surface energy (SFE) values based on multi-liquid measurements
● Measurement conditions, uncertainties, and sample preparation details

Comparing your own droplet shapes and angles against these references is a fast way to spot contamination, treatment drift, or unexpected changes in wettability.

Chapter 3: Surface Tension Measurement

This property measures the force that acts on the surface of a liquid, aiming to minimize its surface area.

Surface Tension Measurement

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Dynamic Surface Tension

Dynamic surface tension differs from static surface tension, which refers to the surface energy per unit area (or force acting per unit length along the edge of a liquid surface).

Static surface tension characterizes the equilibrium state of the liquid interface, while dynamic surface tension accounts for the kinetics of changes at the interface. These changes could involve the presence of surfactants, additives, or variations in temperature, pressure, and composition at the interface.

When to use Dynamic Surface Tension Measurement

Dynamic surface tension is essential for processes that involve rapid changes at the liquid-gas or liquid-liquid interface, such as droplet and bubble formation, coalescence (change in surface area), the behavior of foams, and the drying of paints (change in composition, e.g., evaporation of solvent). It is measured by analyzing the shape of a hanging droplet over time.

Dynamic surface tension applies to various industries, including cosmetics, coatings, pharmaceuticals, paint, food and beverage, and industrial processes, where understanding and controlling the behavior of liquid interfaces is essential for product quality and process efficiency.

Learn how Surface Tension measurement is done on our Tensiometer

For a more complete understanding of Surface Energy measurement, read our Surface Tension measurement: The Definitive Guide

Chapter 4: Surface Energy Measurement

Surface energy refers to the energy required to create a unit area of a new surface.
231

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Learn how Surface Energy measurement is done on our Tensiometer

For a more complete understanding of Surface Energy measurement, read our Surface Energy measurement: The Definitive Guide

For benchmark contact angle and surface energy values on glass, nylon, PMMA, and Teflon, see the Open Benchmark Data panel above or visit our Dataset Hub for full CSV downloads.

Chapter 5: Sliding Angle Measurement

The sliding angle measures the angle at which a liquid film slides over a solid surface. It is commonly employed to assess the slip resistance of a surface.

sliding angle 1

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Learn how Sliding Angle measurement is done on our Tensiometer

For a more complete understanding of Sliding Angle measurement, read our Sliding Angle Measurement: The Definitive Guide

Chapter 6: Real-World Applications

Within the Construction industry, several case studies exemplify the advantages of conducting surface property measurements.

Deterioration of Solar Panels on a Rooftop

Challenge: Dust and pollution accumulated on the solar panels of a commercial building, reducing their energy generation efficiency.

Solution: Applying a hydrophobic and oleophobic coating to the solar panels increased the contact angle, causing rainwater to bead up and carry away dust and pollutants. This self-cleaning effect improved energy generation efficiency and reduced maintenance costs.

Deterioration of Solar Panels on a Rooftop

Water Leakage in Underground Parking Structures

Challenge: Water leakage in an underground parking structure was causing vehicle damage and structural deterioration.

Solution: A waterproofing membrane with low surface tension was applied to the concrete surfaces. This membrane provided effective water repellency, preventing water infiltration and preserving the integrity of the parking structure while protecting the vehicles.

Water Leakage in Underground Parking Structures

Slippery Pedestrian Walkways in a Shopping Mall

Challenge: Slippery pedestrian walkways in a shopping mall led to slip and fall accidents during rainy weather.

Solution: The mall management installed textured, slip-resistant tiles with superhydrophobic surfaces. These tiles, characterized by a water static contact angle above 150° and a sliding angle below 10°, provided better traction even when wet, significantly reducing slip and fall incidents. This increased safety for shoppers and employees and decreased the mall's liability for accidents.

Slippery Pedestrian Walkways in a Shopping Mall

Adhesion Problems in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures

Challenge: Engineers faced adhesion problems between the steel and concrete components in a steel-concrete composite structure due to incompatible surface energies.

Solution: The engineering team applied a bonding agent to the steel beams to modify their surface energy. This agent enhanced compatibility between the steel and concrete, resulting in a robust bond. The composite structure exhibited improved load-bearing capacity and durability, ensuring the building's safety and longevity.

Adhesion Problems in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures

Paint Adhesion Issues on Metal Components

Challenge: An automotive assembly plant experienced paint adhesion problems on metal components, leading to defects and reduced vehicle durability.

Solution: The engineering team improved paint adhesion by selecting a suitable metal pretreatment process. They tested various processes and chose plasma cleaning, which had the lowest surface tension. This solution ensured a durable, long-lasting finish on the vehicles.

Paint Adhesion Issues on Metal Components

We are your partners in solving your Business & Technological challenges

If you are interested in implementing these or any other applications, please contact us.

Chapter 7: Standards and Guidelines

In an industry where precision reigns supreme, how can Construction manufacturers ensure their products withstand scrutiny? The answer lies in standards and guidelines: the compass that guides them through the complex maze of quality and performance.

EN 828:2013 — Adhesives — Wettability by Contact Angle (Surface Free Energy of Solid Surfaces)

What it is

European standard method to determine a solid surface’s wettability and surface free energy (or critical surface tension) by measuring static contact angles of one or more probe liquids on a plane test surface. The resulting metrics support predictions of adhesive wet-out and help characterize surfaces before pretreatment, coating, or bonding.

When to use it

Ready-to-bond screening (before bond-strength testing):

Use contact angle + surface free energy to quickly flag low-wet-out substrates (metals, plastics, glass, coated parts) before you spend time on full lap-shear/peel trials.

Pretreatment/cleaning process control & troubleshooting:

Use repeatable, multi-liquid measurements to detect contamination, treatment drift (plasma/corona/flame/primer), and surface aging/recovery that can drive adhesion failures.

In-scope / Out-of-scope

In scope
  • Static sessile-drop contact angle measurements on plane test pieces/coupons with statistical interpretation across replicates.
  • Multi-liquid surface free energy determination using a documented model and known liquid properties (commonly ≥3 and up to 8 probe liquids).
  • Uniformity/heterogeneity assessment via spot-to-spot and drop-to-drop variability (useful for contamination streaks or non-uniform activation).
  • QC-style execution on contact-angle goniometers with suitable measurement range and SFE modeling software (e.g., Dropometer-style workflows that support common SFE models such as Equation-of-State, Fowkes, and Oss–Good).
Out of scope
  • Direct bond strength / durability testing (lap shear, peel, wedge, fatigue, environmental aging) — these require separate mechanical test standards.
  • Universal pass/fail criteria for “good bonding” — EN 828 provides the method, not a single acceptance threshold that applies to all adhesive systems.
  • Dynamic wetting methods (advancing/receding angles, hysteresis) unless you apply other standards specifically covering dynamic angles.
  • Identifying surface chemistry/roughness root cause directly (e.g., spectroscopy, profilometry) — EN 828 reports wettability outcomes, not chemical composition.

Minimum you must report (checklist)

  • Substrate description: material, finish (and roughness class if known), coating/primer details, and any surface-treatment method used.
  • Time history: time from cleaning/pretreatment to measurement (and time to bonding if this is a release gate).
  • Probe liquids: identity and count of liquids used, plus the liquid property values used in the SFE calculation.
  • Measurement method: sessile-drop static geometry, droplet volume, and the fixed timestamp used to record θ.
  • Replication plan: number of drops per liquid and the number/locations of measurement spots (map/grid).
  • Contact angle results per liquid: median θ plus a spread metric (IQR or SD), including the number of valid drops used.
  • Data-quality/exclusions: your rule for rejecting droplets (e.g., poor edge/baseline fit, non-axisymmetric drops, obvious contamination) and how many were rejected.
  • Surface free energy result: total SFE (and component terms if used), the specific model used, and the instrument/software version used to compute it.

Note: EN 828 tells you how to measure and calculate wettability/SFE, but it does not define universal “good bonding” thresholds—your limits must be calibrated to your adhesive + substrate + pretreatment and validated against bond tests. Roughness and chemical non-uniformity can bias static angles, so consistent surface prep, replication, and drop-quality QC are essential.

How to interpret results (guardrails)

  • Lower θ at the fixed timepoint generally means better wetting by that probe liquid, but interpret results primarily relative to your validated “golden” reference surface and your internal control limits.
  • High scatter is a first-class signal: large drop-to-drop or spot-to-spot spread often indicates contamination, non-uniform activation, or heterogeneity—don’t average it away; investigate and map it.
  • SFE is best used as a controlled comparative metric: it’s reliable for trending (before/after treatment, lot-to-lot control) only when the liquid set and model are locked in your SOP.
  • Do not treat θ or SFE as a direct bond-strength guarantee: confirm with representative bond tests and track failure mode (adhesive vs cohesive vs interfacial) to set/maintain Green/Yellow/Red release gates.

Now It’s Your Turn

We hope this guide showed you how to apply surface science in the Construction industry.

Now we’d like to turn it over to you: 

Feel free to leave a comment below—we’d love to hear from you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Download Experiment