“
Wettability is set by the top five to ten ångström of a surface: what the liquid actually sees. It doesn't matter what lies beneath; that outermost layer is what you are really measuring.
IEC TS 62073 gives three ways to rate how well an insulator surface repels water. The Dropometer is fully compliant with Method A, the contact angle method, for static and dynamic angles. It does not run Method B or Method C, which are visual tests.
What brings you here?
Utility engineer
You need to know whether aged silicone rubber still repels water. Method A gives you angles you can compare against new material and track over the years.
Materials R&D
You need to compare compounds before and after ageing, and see how fast hydrophobicity recovers. Static and dynamic angles show both.
Test lab
You need to choose between the contact angle, test liquid and spray methods for a client. Use the decision tree to match the method to the question.
Free one page checklist for IEC TS 62073 Method A: specimen choice, static and dynamic angle settings, captive bubble notes, how many spots to measure and what to record.
Talk to an expert
Tell us your compound, your ageing test and how you rate hydrophobicity today. We will show Method A live and tell you plainly where the Dropometer fits and where it does not.
IEC TS 62073:2016, Guidance on the measurement of hydrophobicity of insulator surfaces, edition 2.0, with Corrigendum 1 issued in 2026. It covers the shed and housing material of composite insulators, such as those on overhead lines and in substations, and ceramic insulators, whether or not they are covered by a coating.
Fully compliant with Method A. The Dropometer measures the static angle, and the advancing and receding angles by adding and withdrawing water. The captive bubble option in the annex needs the optional cuvette. Methods B and C are visual tests.
Contact angle range 10° to 175°, accuracy ±0.35°, display resolution 0.01°, from the Dropometer product specification.
The drop shape method is validated against a KRUSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers. See our validation publications.
Researchers used the Dropometer to compare water contact angle and roll off across bio based ski wax prototypes. Different material, same hydrophobicity measurement. Read our analysis of the paper.
A defense manufacturer chose the Dropometer to verify a new oleophobic coating, and its engineer was measuring in under an hour. Read the case study.
Hydrophobicity is one input. It does not replace electrical ageing, tracking or flashover tests.
What this specification measures, who uses it and how the Dropometer fits
IEC TS 62073 gives guidance on measuring how water repellent an insulator surface is, using contact angle (Method A), test liquids (Method B) or a water spray rated by eye (Method C). Utilities, insulator makers and test labs use it to track silicone rubber ageing and recovery. The Dropometer is fully compliant with Method A, static and dynamic.
Method A gives you numbers you can trend: the static angle, plus advancing and receding angles that show how drops pin or roll. Methods B and C stay useful for quick ratings, and need no instrument.
The Dropometer contact angle kit weighs 1 kg and runs on battery, so you can measure in a test bay or at a substation. For the full workflow, see high voltage insulator hydrophobicity. Background reading: our electrical and electronics guide, the contact angle measurement guide and the lotus effect.
Further reading: how to keep results comparable in reproducible contact angle measurement, what to look for in a goniometer for industrial QA, a classroom version in superhydrophobic surfaces on glass, and our open reference measurements.
Method A, step by step, in our own words
These steps outline Method A. They do not replace the specification. Buy the current edition, including Corrigendum 1, and follow its specimen and drop rules.
From the Dropometer product specification. Display resolution is 0.01°.
Base plate, phone holder, LED and syringe. No PC needed.
5 V battery only operation, so the unit can go to a test bay or substation.
Use a flat area of the shed or housing, or a coupon from the same compound. Record the service or ageing history. Do not clean the surface unless your test plan says so.
Place the base plate on a level surface, mount the phone and LED, and fill the Hamilton syringe with deionised water. Secure the specimen flat on the sessile stage.
Place a drop of the volume the specification sets. Automatic edge and baseline detection reads the angle from the profile, so two operators get the same reading from the same image.
Add water through the needle until the contact line moves to read the advancing angle. Withdraw water until it retreats to read the receding angle. If your plan uses the captive bubble option, use the optional cuvette.
Measure several spots on each specimen. Pollution, discharge exposure and ageing are rarely even across a shed.
Record the mean, spread and hysteresis for each specimen, with the date and rest time. Compare against new material and your own limits.
This video shows a complete Dropometer contact angle measurement, from setup to result. It covers the static steps above in one run.
Independent benchmarking and publication-based validation references.
Peer reviewed method
The Dropometer drop shape method is validated against a KRUSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers, one in Review of Scientific Instruments and one in Colloids and Surfaces A. Published contact angle accuracy is ±0.35°.
Customer evidence
We have no published client paper or case study on insulators yet. Customers have published Dropometer contact angle data on other water repellent surfaces.
IEC TS 62073 · Method A · ageing and recovery
IEC TS 62073 tells you how to measure. It does not set a pass mark. Your acceptance limits come from your utility or product specification.
Start with a baseline: measure new material from the same compound on the same settings. Then measure aged or field samples against that baseline, and repeat after a set recovery time.
The specification notes that a result reflects the surface at the time of measurement. So record the date, the service or ageing history, and how long the sample rested before you measured.
Example data for illustration only. These are not measured results. Your compound, ageing method and limits decide the numbers.
| Specimen | Static (°) | Advancing (°) | Receding (°) | Hysteresis (°) | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New material | 106.4 | 112.1 | 89.7 | 22.4 | Baseline |
| After discharge ageing | 74.8 | 88.3 | 38.6 | 49.7 | Loss of hydrophobicity |
| Aged, after 48 h rest | 98.2 | 107.5 | 76.9 | 30.6 | Recovering |
Each row is the mean of five drops. Hysteresis is advancing minus receding. A falling receding angle and rising hysteresis show drops starting to pin, before the static angle drops far.
The same example data as the table, plotted. Hysteresis is shown above each receding bar.
Example data, not measured results. H is hysteresis, advancing minus receding.
What changes when hydrophobicity is a measured angle
| Metric | Before Dropometer | With Dropometer | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| How hydrophobicity is rated | Spray method classes judged by eye (Method C) | Measured contact angles (Method A) | Both methods are in IEC TS 62073 |
| Result format | A class from reference pictures | Static, advancing and receding angles, ±0.35° accuracy | Dropometer product specification |
| Where it runs | Lab goniometer, sample shipped in | Battery unit in a test bay or at site, up to 8 h | Dropometer product specification |
| Record | Photo and class | Drop image and angles saved per measurement | No published benchmark |
Send or bring a new sample and an aged one. We will measure both live, static and dynamic.
Enter your own numbers. The defaults are examples, not Droplet Lab results.
Quality cost snapshot
Result
Annual exposure combines audit/CAPA cost, customer rejections, and recall probability; avoided exposure applies the risk reduction percentage.
Lock these before you compare samples or sites
| Parameter | Recommended Setting | Technical Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Test liquid | Deionised water | Method A is a water contact angle method. |
| Static angle | Sessile drop, read at a fixed time | Gives the headline hydrophobicity value. |
| Dynamic angles | Add and withdraw water through the needle, or captive bubble with the optional cuvette | Method A covers advancing and receding angles. Both routes are possible on the Dropometer. |
| Drop volume | As the specification sets, fixed for every drop | A changing volume adds spread that is not about the surface. |
| Specimen | Flat area or coupon from the same compound | Ribbed or curved sheds need a flat section or a custom holder, available on request. |
| Replicates | Several spots per specimen | Ageing and pollution are rarely even across a surface. |
| Fit model | Young-Laplace or polynomial, the same for every run | Both models are in the Dropometer software. Do not mix them within one study. |
| Environment | Record temperature and humidity | The Dropometer runs at 10 to 45 °C without condensation and has no temperature control. |
Pick the method by the answer you need
Start: How will you rate the insulator surface?
You compare compounds, ageing steps or field samples against a baseline.
Use Method A, contact angle. The Dropometer is fully compliant with static and dynamic angles.
You inspect many insulators and need a fast class for each.
Use Method C, the spray method. Contact angle can back up borderline classes.
You want to know which test liquid still wets the surface.
Use Method B with its test liquids. No instrument is needed.
Your question is material selection, not one measurement.
See IEC TR 62039.
Start from how you will rate the surface. Blue boxes are measurements the Dropometer runs.
Pick the method by how you will rate the surface.
What the angles tell you, and what they do not
Honest limits of the method and of the Dropometer
The technical specification describes three methods. Method A measures water contact angle, static and dynamic. Method B uses test liquids of known surface tension to see which still wet the surface. Method C sprays water and rates the result by eye against reference pictures, giving a hydrophobicity class.
Yes, for Method A. It measures the static angle and the advancing and receding angles on sessile drops, with ±0.35° accuracy. With the optional cuvette it also runs the captive bubble option. Methods B and C are visual tests that need no instrument.
No. It is a Technical Specification that gives guidance on how to determine the hydrophobicity of the shed or housing. Acceptance limits come from your utility or product specification, so build them from your own baseline and aged samples.
Often, yes. The Dropometer weighs 1 kg and runs on battery for up to 8 hours. You still need a flat area or a coupon, a dry surface and stable conditions, because the unit has no temperature control.
The static angle shows whether water beads. The receding angle and hysteresis show whether drops pin or roll away. Pinned drops can join into water paths, so dynamic angles often show early ageing that the static angle hides.
Not on its own. Hydrophobicity is one input. Pair it with the electrical and ageing tests your specification calls for, and track the same specimens over time.
This page summarises IEC TS 62073 in our own words and does not reproduce the specification. Buy the current edition and its corrigendum from IEC before you write a procedure. Droplet Lab does not certify compliance. Your own method validation does.
Sources, review and tools
IEC TS 62073:2016 listing and preview from IEC, the Dropometer product specification and Droplet Lab validation papers.
Drafted with Claude (Anthropic) from the sources listed, then reviewed by Droplet Lab.
We did not copy text from the specification. Buy the current edition for the full procedure.
October 2026
Spotted an issue in this summary? Send a correction request and our team will review it.
Correction Request
We work hard to keep this page accurate and up to date. If you spot an error (wrong revision/year, missing requirement, incorrect interpretation, or broken link), tell us and we'll review it.
Contact us to report a correction