Contents

Surface tension tensiometer comparison

Dropometer vs OpenDrop

OpenDrop is free, open source software for pendant drop tensiometry and contact angle: you supply the camera, light, syringe and stage. The Dropometer is a complete pendant drop kit with a published accuracy and a warranty. This page compares the two on cost, accuracy, setup, scope and support, using OpenDrop's own documentation and paper.

Dropometer pendant drop tensiometer: smartphone on a stage beside a pendant drop at a needle tip

Dropometer

US$4,990 base kit, checked 12 November 2026, Droplet Lab

VS
Home built pendant drop rig with camera, light source and syringe

OpenDrop with a home built rig

Software free (GPL 3.0); hardware you buy, camera about US$20 to US$1,000 per the authors; checked 12 November 2026

Abhimanyu Photo
Written by
Abhimanyu Bhandankar
Holds an MBA from Schulich School of Business and a BE in IT. He joined Droplet Lab in July 2019 and now leads sales and marketing.
CEO at Droplet Lab
Read More
Gurdeep-Saini-Photo
Technical Review by
Gurdeep Singh Saini
Holds a BASc in Mechanical Engineering from Ryerson University (now Toronto Metropolitan University) and an MASc from York University. He develops the automatic edge and baseline detection behind the Dropometer's analysis.
COO at Droplet Lab
Read More
Abhimanyu Photo
Written By

Abhimanyu Bhandankar

CEO at Droplet Lab

Holds an MBA from Schulich School of Business and a BE in IT. He joined Droplet Lab in July 2019 and now leads sales and marketing.

Gurdeep-Saini-Photo
Reviewed By

Gurdeep Singh Saini

COO at Droplet Lab

Holds a BASc in Mechanical Engineering from Ryerson University (now Toronto Metropolitan University) and an MASc from York University. He develops the automatic edge and baseline detection behind the Dropometer's analysis.

The short answer

If you have the skills and time to build, align and validate your own optics, and the goal is teaching or method development, OpenDrop is a capable free choice. For a published accuracy, a supported kit that works on day one, battery operation and a 5 year warranty, the Dropometer (US$4,990) is the better buy.

When OpenDrop is the better choice

  • You want to see and change the code. OpenDrop is released under the GNU GPL and its source is on GitHub.
  • You already own a good camera and optics. It reads images from files, USB webcams or GenICam industrial cameras.
  • You teach image analysis or drop shape fitting. Students build the rig and see every step of the fit.
  • Budget is close to zero and staff time is not. The software is free; the authors put the camera at about US$20 to US$1,000.

When the Dropometer is the better choice

  • You need a published accuracy. ±0.03 mN/m for surface tension and ±0.35° for contact angle on the datasheet, compared with a KRÜSS DSA100E in peer review. A home built rig has no stated figure until you validate it.
  • You want results on day one. Stage, light, needle holder and phone come aligned in a 1 kg kit.
  • You measure away from the bench. Battery up to 8 hours, offline.
  • You need surface free energy. Equation of State, Fowkes and van Oss-Chaudhury-Good in the app.
  • You need support and a warranty. 5 year hardware warranty and 5 years of software updates. See the Dropometer pendant drop tensiometer.

When not to buy a Dropometer

  • You have an optics bench, a good camera and the time to validate a rig, and need nothing more than pendant drop and contact angle.
  • You must modify the fitting code for a research method.
  • Your liquids read above 75 mN/m, the top of the Dropometer's stated range.
  • You need high speed imaging; a fast industrial camera on OpenDrop can go beyond the Dropometer's 10 fps.

Executive summary

Both use the same physics. A drop hangs from a needle, its outline is recorded, and the Young–Laplace equation is fitted to the shape. The difference is everything around the fit. OpenDrop is the software only; its accuracy depends on the camera, lens, lighting, needle and alignment you choose. The Dropometer is the software plus the hardware, built and checked as one system. Our surface tension measurement guide explains the method.

Where they overlap

Both measure pendant drop surface and interfacial tension and sessile drop contact angle.

Both come from academic research: OpenDrop from the group behind Berry et al. (2015), the Dropometer from Dr. Alidad Amirfazli's group, with its methods published in 2017 and 2018.

Both need careful technique: a clean needle, a sharp outline and the right density difference.

Where they differ and why it matters

Hardware

With OpenDrop you choose, buy and align the camera, lens, backlight, syringe, needle and stage. The Dropometer ships them as one kit with the phone included.

Stated accuracy

OpenDrop's documentation states no measured error figure, because the result depends on your rig. The Dropometer datasheet states ±0.03 mN/m and ±0.35°.

Cost

OpenDrop is free; the hardware and the staff time to build and validate it are not. The Dropometer is US$4,990 for the base kit.

Support

OpenDrop is supported through its GitHub project and documentation. The Dropometer comes with a 5 year hardware warranty, 5 years of software updates and support from Droplet Lab.

A deeper look at the criteria that decide it

What OpenDrop does

OpenDrop is Python software for pendant drop tensiometry and contact angle, described in the Journal of Open Source Software (2021). It installs on Windows, macOS and Linux, and reads images from files, USB webcams or GenICam (GigE Vision, USB3 Vision) cameras. Its documentation covers installation and use.

What decides the accuracy of a home built rig

The pixel scale, usually set from the needle diameter; lens distortion; a vertical camera and needle; a sharp, evenly lit outline; and a drop large enough to deform under gravity. Berry et al. (2015) show that small, nearly spherical drops give poor precision, and give a Worthington number to judge drop size. Each of these is yours to check on a home built rig.

How the Dropometer is built and checked

A phone camera with 4x zoom and an LED backlight sit on a fixed stage with a needle holder, so camera, light and needle keep the same geometry from one session to the next. The app fits the Young–Laplace equation using the density difference you enter. Two peer reviewed papers compared it with a KRÜSS DSA100E. Try it with our pendant drop experiment.

What the free option really costs

Add the camera and lens, a light source, a syringe pump or manual syringe, needles, a stage and a PC, then the hours to build, align and validate against a reference liquid. For contact angle without pendant drop, see also DIY ImageJ vs Dropometer.

Specification and capability matrix

Figures from each maker's own pages and data sheets, checked 12 November 2026.

Criterion OpenDrop (home built rig) Dropometer
What you get Software only; you build the hardware Complete kit: stage, light, needle holder, phone and app
Price (checked 12 November 2026) Software free; camera about US$20 to US$1,000 (authors) US$4,990 base kit
Surface and interfacial tension Yes, pendant drop; range not stated Up to 75 mN/m
Stated accuracy None published; depends on your rig ±0.03 mN/m; ±0.35° contact angle (datasheet)
Contact angle Yes 10° to 175°
Surface free energy Not listed in the documentation Equation of State, Fowkes, van Oss-Chaudhury-Good
Camera Your choice: USB webcam or GenICam industrial camera Phone camera, 10 fps, 4x zoom
Platform Python on Windows, macOS or Linux Android and iOS app
Power and weight Depends on your rig; PC and light usually mains Battery up to 8 h; 1 kg
Licence GNU GPL 3.0, open source Lifetime licence
Support and warranty GitHub project and documentation 5 year hardware warranty; 5 years of software updates

How we built this comparison

We read OpenDrop's GitHub page, documentation and JOSS paper, Berry et al. (2015), and the Dropometer specification on 12 November 2026. We did not build an OpenDrop rig for this page, so it gives no time per sample or agreement figures.

Disclosure: Droplet Lab makes the Dropometer, so read this page knowing that. Every OpenDrop statement links to its own documentation or paper. The verdict changes for a lab that already has the optics and the skills to validate them, or that must change the fitting code: there OpenDrop wins. Made with Claude Opus 5.5 and reviewed by Droplet Lab.

Expert perspective

OpenDrop and the Dropometer fit the same equation; the number you get depends on how the image was made. The quote below makes the same point about contact angle.

The method decides the number

Not all contact-angle measurements are created equal: the right method depends on the application. A sessile drop and a tilted plate can give very different, and equally correct, numbers.

Dr. Alidad Amirfazli Co-founder and Scientific Advisor, Droplet Lab ResearchGate profile Google Scholar profile

What this means here: whichever you use, check the setup against a reference liquid such as pure water before you trust a new result, and record that check.

Recommendations by scenario

A teaching lab on image analysis

Pick: OpenDrop, if staff can build and maintain the rigs; the Dropometer education unit if not. See the teaching lab guide.

Method development that changes the fit

Pick: OpenDrop. Open code you can inspect and extend.

QC or contract work with a stated accuracy

Pick: Dropometer. A published figure and a warranty. See the production QC guide.

Measurements on site or at the line

Pick: Dropometer. Battery powered, 1 kg, offline.

A first tensiometer under US$5,000

Pick: Dropometer, unless you already own the optics. See the under US$5,000 guide.

Bottom line

Use OpenDrop when you have the optics, the skills and the time to build and validate a rig, or when you need to change the code. Use the Dropometer when you need a published accuracy, a kit that works on day one, battery operation, surface free energy and a warranty. If you are unsure, book a 15 minute consult and bring a liquid you already measure.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenDrop accurate?

The fitting is well founded, but a home built rig has no stated accuracy until you check it. Camera scale, lens distortion, alignment, lighting and drop size all set the result. Validate against a reference liquid such as pure water.

What hardware does OpenDrop need?

A camera (USB webcam or GenICam industrial camera), a lens, an even backlight, a syringe and needle, a stage, and a PC running Windows, macOS or Linux. Its authors put the camera at about US$20 to US$1,000.

Can I use OpenDrop with a Dropometer?

OpenDrop can analyse images loaded from files, so in principle it can read exported drop images. We have not tested this, and the Dropometer's stated accuracy applies to its own app.

Does OpenDrop calculate surface free energy?

Its documentation does not list it. You can enter contact angles from any instrument into our free contact angle to surface energy calculator.

Is pendant drop accurate enough for research?

Yes, with good technique. The Dropometer was compared with a KRÜSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers. Our surface tension measurement guide covers the technique.

Bring a liquid you already measure

Validated measurement approach

Where the Dropometer's accuracy figure comes from.

Benchmarked against a KRÜSS DSA100E

Dropometer contact angle and pendant drop surface tension were compared with a KRÜSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers: Review of Scientific Instruments (2018) and Colloids and Surfaces A (2017).

Read the validation papers

Used in 59 customer publications

Customers have cited the Dropometer in 59 peer reviewed papers, theses and conference papers, listed with links.

Browse the citations

References

1.
OpenDrop on GitHub Licence, cameras supported, operating systems; checked 12 November 2026
2.
OpenDrop documentation Installation and use; checked 12 November 2026
5.
Dropometer product page and specification, Droplet Lab Pendant drop range, accuracy, resolution, power and price; checked 12 November 2026
6.
Droplet Lab validation papers Peer reviewed comparisons with a KRÜSS DSA100E: Review of Scientific Instruments (2018) and Colloids and Surfaces A (2017)