Contents

Measurement explainer

Surface Tension vs Surface Energy: What Is the Difference?

Surface tension and surface energy describe the same thing: the energy cost of creating a surface. Surface tension is used for liquids and is measured directly in mN/m. Surface free energy is used for solids and is calculated from contact angles in mJ/m², so the result depends on the model and test liquids you choose.

Updated October 23, 20265 min read
Surface Tension vs Surface Energy: What Is the Difference?
Gurdeep-Saini-Photo
Written by
Gurdeep Singh Saini
Holds a BASc in Mechanical Engineering from Ryerson University (now Toronto Metropolitan University) and an MASc from York University. He develops the automatic edge and baseline detection behind the Dropometer's analysis.
COO at Droplet Lab
Read More
Droplet-Lab logo
Reviewed by
Droplet Lab Team
Droplet Lab builds precision instruments and software for surface science measurement, specialising in contact angle analysis and surface tension characterisation. Used by researchers across materials science, pharmaceuticals, coatings, and advanced manufacturing, Droplet Lab's Dropometer has contributed to studies published in peer-reviewed journals including Advanced Functional Materials (Impact Factor 19). The team combines instrument engineering with deep domain knowledge in wettability science with a focus on practical accuracy.
Read More
Gurdeep-Saini-Photo
Written By

Gurdeep Singh Saini

COO at Droplet Lab

Holds a BASc in Mechanical Engineering from Ryerson University (now Toronto Metropolitan University) and an MASc from York University. He develops the automatic edge and baseline detection behind the Dropometer's analysis.

Droplet-Lab logo
Reviewed By

Droplet Lab Team

Droplet Lab builds precision instruments and software for surface science measurement, specialising in contact angle analysis and surface tension characterisation. Used by researchers across materials science, pharmaceuticals, coatings, and advanced manufacturing, Droplet Lab's Dropometer has contributed to studies published in peer-reviewed journals including Advanced Functional Materials (Impact Factor 19). The team combines instrument engineering with deep domain knowledge in wettability science with a focus on practical accuracy.

Are surface tension and surface energy the same thing?

Short answer: physically, yes; in practice, they are used for different materials. For a pure liquid the two numbers are identical, because 1 mN/m equals 1 mJ/m², and both equal the older unit dyn/cm.

The difference is how you get the number. A liquid's surface tension can be measured directly, while a solid's surface free energy can only be inferred from how liquids wet it.

Molecules at a free surface have fewer neighbours, so they sit at a higher potential energy than molecules in the bulk of the liquid. That excess energy per unit area is the surface energy.

What is the relation between surface tension and surface energy?

Picture a soap film stretched across a wire frame with one sliding wire of length L. Surface tension pulls the sliding wire inward with a force of 2γL, because the film has two free surfaces, front and back.

Pull the wire outward by a small distance x and the area of the film grows by 2Lx. The work done is force times distance, 2γLx. Divide that work by the new area and you get γ. So the energy per unit area needed to increase the surface area equals the force per unit length acting along the surface.

That is the relation between surface tension and surface energy for a liquid: the same number, read as a force in mN/m or as an energy in mJ/m². The work done is stored as surface free energy, which is why a free liquid drop pulls into a spherical shape, the least surface area possible for its volume. Surface tension also raises the pressure inside a drop of radius r by 2γ/r compared with the air outside.

Solids are different. Stretching a solid can strain its existing surface instead of adding new molecules to it, so surface stress and surface free energy are not always equal (Shuttleworth, 1950). For solids, surface free energy is the useful quantity, and it is calculated from contact angles.

How is surface tension measured on a liquid?

The pendant drop method images a hanging drop and fits its shape with the Young-Laplace equation. Force methods measure the pull of the liquid on a plate or ring.

Either way, you get one number for one liquid at one temperature. The surface tension measurement guide compares the methods, and ISO 19403-3 describes the pendant drop method for paints and varnishes.

How is surface energy measured on a solid?

A solid cannot be stretched like a liquid, so you place drops of known liquids on it and measure their contact angles. Young's equation links each angle to the solid's surface energy (Young, 1805).

A model then turns the angles into a number. Owens and Wendt (1969) split surface energy into dispersive and polar parts and need at least two liquids. Zisman's critical surface tension uses a series of liquids and extrapolates to complete wetting (Fox and Zisman, 1950).

Different models and liquid sets give different values for the same surface. Always report which model and liquids you used, as ISO 19403-2 describes. The surface energy measurement guide goes deeper, and the surface energy calculator runs the models on your own angles.

Expert Quote

Surface free energy is never read straight off a solid; it is calculated, and the model and the test liquids you choose are part of the answer. Report them with the number, or the number cannot be compared.

Dr Alidad Amirfazli

Dr Alidad Amirfazli, Droplet Lab co-founder and Professor of Mechanical Engineering, York University

Surface tension or surface energy: which term applies?

AspectSurface tensionSurface free energy
Applies toLiquidsSolids
How it is obtainedMeasured directlyCalculated from contact angles
Usual unitmN/mmJ/m²
Typical methodPendant drop, plate or ringSessile drop with two or more liquids
Main sources of variationTemperature, purity, surfactantsModel, test liquids, surface preparation

Where do dyne levels fit in?

Dyne inks and pens are liquids of known surface tension brushed onto a solid. If the ink stays wet for a set time, the surface energy is taken to be at least that dyne level.

That gives a quick pass or fail threshold. A contact angle measurement gives a number you can trend over time and compare between operators and sites.

See the dyne pens and contact angle comparison and the corona treatment monitoring use case for how this plays out on a film line. Beyond 38 Dynes explains what a dyne level does and does not tell you about adhesion.

Why does the difference matter for coating and bonding?

A coating, ink or adhesive wets a surface well when its surface tension is lower than the solid's surface energy. So you need both numbers: the liquid's surface tension and the solid's surface free energy.

The Dropometer pendant drop tensiometer and contact angle goniometer measures both on one portable kit. Its drop shape method was validated against a KRÜSS DSA100E in peer review; the papers are in the validation library.

Where can you go deeper?

Measure both numbers on one instrument

See surface tension and surface free energy measured on the same portable kit, in a short call.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is surface tension the same as surface energy?

For a pure liquid, yes: the values are equal and 1 mN/m equals 1 mJ/m². For solids, surface free energy is calculated from contact angles rather than measured directly.

Why do I get different surface energy values for the same polymer?

Different models and test liquids give different answers. Report the model, the liquids and the measured angles with every value (ISO 19403-2).

What is a dyne?

Dyne per centimetre is the older unit for surface tension and surface energy. 1 dyn/cm equals 1 mN/m.

Can I get surface energy from one liquid?

Models such as Owens and Wendt (1969) need at least two liquids, one with a strong polar part such as water and one mainly dispersive such as diiodomethane.

References

1. Young, T. (1805). An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 95, 65 to 87. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1805.0005
2. Owens, D. K. and Wendt, R. C. (1969). Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 13(8), 1741 to 1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815
3. Fox, H. W. and Zisman, W. A. (1950). The spreading of liquids on low energy surfaces. I. Polytetrafluoroethylene. Journal of Colloid Science 5(6), 514 to 531. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(50)90044-4
4. ISO 19403-2:2017. Paints and varnishes. Wettability. Part 2: Determination of the surface free energy of solid surfaces by measuring the contact angle. International Organization for Standardization. Summary: Droplet Lab ISO 19403-2 page
5. Droplet Lab (2026). Peer reviewed validation of the Dropometer drop shape method (Review of Scientific Instruments; Colloids and Surfaces A). Droplet Lab validation library. https://dropletlab.com/validation/publications/
6. Shuttleworth, R. (1950). The surface tension of solids. Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section A 63(5), 444 to 457. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/63/5/302